I Support the Liquor License Limit

The Madison city government is considering a proposition that would freeze the number of liquor licenses available downtown.  This would prevent new bars from opening, and there would be restrictions on expansion of existing bars.

I wholeheartedly endorse this proposal.  Downtown Madison is overrun with drunkenness.  I’m not talking zombie-apocalypse overrun or anything, and I’m not referring to the Club Majestic issues.  There’s just a whole lot of drunks out at night, and not much else.

Stopping expansion of bars downtown, and eventually reducing it, will lead to a more varied state street area, and make it a more lucrative attraction for students and others alike.  As-is, there’s pretty no reason to go downtown except to drink.  We need more dry entertainment alternatives.  Like another downtown mainstream movie theater (even if it serves beer like University Square used to , its far better than a bar for downtown variety, and is a wonderful attraction for students.)

Of course, people will lambast this as ‘anti-business.’  Its nothing of the sort: its against a certain kind of business, and we’ll turn into a city with different businesses.  Change is good.  This is progress.  The field will be more competitive for new bar owners; they’ll have to obtain their licenses from the hands of those who have them and not the government; this should foster some competiton and bring out the best and the brightest entrepreneurs… isn’t that what you “pro-business” people want?

We the people of Madison have a chance to decide what we want our city to be.  I think it’s getting better.


5 thoughts on “I Support the Liquor License Limit

  1. Rahvin says:

    A better solution, of course, would be if entreneurs decided for themselves to open more varied types of commercial enterprises in the area. I think that’s what pro-business people want.

  2. Willow says:

    …and that’s why we have a government. Because unrestricted free markets don’t work.

  3. Rahvin says:

    I always wondered why we had a government…

  4. Rahvin says:

    I wonder if any pro-business people have considered the idea of a free justice system. You know, where people can distribute and exchange punishment and create laws as they see fit, in society’s best interest, without “hostile” interference by government…

    Hmm, maybe I should write a book…

  5. @ Rahvin, great idea, that’d be a damn good book (note ‘d is probably short for could, not would, as is usual)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: